Medical Letter (Med Ltr) recognizes the growing use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in research, writing, and scholarly communication. The journal supports the responsible and transparent use of AI technologies while maintaining the principles of research integrity, authorship accountability, and publication ethics.
This policy is aligned with current recommendations and best practices in scholarly publishing, including guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics and major international indexing and publishing standards.
Authors may use Generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, and similar technologies) for purposes such as:
However, authors remain fully responsible for all content submitted to the journal.
Any use of Generative AI in the preparation of a manuscript must be clearly disclosed in the manuscript under a separate section entitled “AI Use Disclosure” or within the Acknowledgments section.
"The authors used a Generative AI tool for language editing and manuscript preparation. The authors reviewed, verified, and take full responsibility for the final content of the manuscript."
Failure to disclose significant use of AI tools may be considered a breach of publication ethics.
Generative AI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors.
AI systems cannot:
Only human contributors who meet the journal’s authorship criteria may be named as authors.
Authors are solely responsible for:
The use of AI does not reduce the authors' responsibility for the integrity of their work.
Authors must not use Generative AI tools to:
Any misuse of AI may result in rejection, retraction, or other editorial actions.
If AI-generated or AI-assisted images, illustrations, graphical abstracts, or figures are included in a manuscript, authors must:
The Editorial Office may request additional information regarding AI-generated visual content.
Reviewers must not upload submitted manuscripts, figures, tables, supplementary files, or confidential peer-review materials into Generative AI systems, as doing so may compromise confidentiality, intellectual property, and data protection.
Reviewers remain responsible for preparing their own independent review reports.
Editors may use AI-assisted tools for administrative purposes, such as plagiarism screening, language assessment, or workflow support. However, all editorial decisions, peer-review evaluations, and publication decisions shall be made solely by qualified human editors.
The use of Generative AI must comply with:
Any concerns regarding AI-related misconduct will be investigated according to the journal’s ethical procedures and COPE guidance.
Medical Letter (Med Ltr) supports the responsible, transparent, and ethical use of Generative AI technologies in scholarly publishing. Authors, reviewers, and editors must ensure that AI is used as a supportive tool rather than a substitute for human judgment, accountability, and scientific responsibility. Final responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, and originality of all published content remains with the human authors and contributors.